Businesses that are contemplating hiring “unpaid interns” for seasonal summer work should critically assess whether those internships actually qualify as paid positions. The Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) defines the term “employ” very broadly as including to “suffer or permit to work.” Internships in the “for-profit” private sector will generally be viewed as employment, unless the six-criterion test described below is met:
Rule #1: The training, even though it includes actual operation of the facilities of the employer, is similar to what would be given in a vocational school or academic educational instruction.
Rule #2: The training is for the benefit of the trainees.
Rule #3: The trainees do not displace regular employees, but work under their close observation.
Rule #4: The employer that provides the training derives no immediate advantage from the activities of the trainees and, on occasion, the employer’s operations may actually be impeded.
Rule #5: The trainees are not necessarily entitled to a job at the conclusion of the training period.
Rule #6: The employer and the trainees understand that the trainees are not entitled to wages for the time spent in training.
If all six factors are met, an employment relationship does not exist and the FLSA’s minimum wage and overtime provisions do not apply to the intern.
- Partner
A member of Plunkett Cooney's Bloomfield Hills office, Courtney L. Nichols serves as the firm's Litigation Department Leader.
Ms. Nichols focuses her litigation practice in the area of employment law, including discrimination ...
Add a comment
Subscribe
RSSTopics
- Employment Liability
- Labor Law
- Human Resources
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Employment Agreement
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Wage & Hour
- Employment Discrimination
- National Labor Relations Act
- Minimum Wage
- At Will Employment
- Noncompete Agreements
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- COVID-19
- Civil Rights
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- National Labor Relations Board
- Contract Employees
- Coronavirus
- Tax Law
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Regulatory Law
- Title VII
- OSHA Issues
- Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA)
- Federal Trade Commission
- Retaliation
- Sick Leave
- Civil Litigation
- Settlements
- Unemployment Benefits
- Workplace Harassment
- Contracts
- Transgender Issues
- Accommodations
- First Amendment
- Hostile Work Environment
- Business Risk Management
- Public Education
- ERISA
- Workers' Compensation
- Cannabis
- Department of Justice
- Medicare Issues
- LGBTQ
- Class Actions
- Sexual Harassment
- Garnishments
- Social Media
- Retail Liability
- RICO
- Emergency Information
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Title IX
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- Diversity
- Union Organizing & Relations
Recent Updates
- Implementing the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act: Key Insights for Employers
- Federal Court Throws out DOL’s Attempt to Rewrite White Collar Overtime Rules
- Civil Rights Litigation Filed by Christian Employers Gets New Life Following Federal Appellate Court Ruling
- Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Minimum Wage Decision
- Judge Strikes Down Federal Ban on Non-compete Agreements
- Michigan Employers Can Legally Resist Union Organizing Efforts
- Michigan Supreme Court Decision Reinstates Previous Versions of Wage Laws
- Union Power in Michigan: Is it Real or Imagined?
- Employers Should act Now to Address Rising DOL Salary Thresholds for Exempt Employees
- Is This the end of the Employee Non-Compete Clause?