This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and improve functionality. To learn more, you may view our Privacy Policy here. By continuing to browse this website, you are accepting our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy.

I Accept

Before agreeing contractually to settle disputes through arbitration, parties will want to consider who will make that call and about which issues.

CommentsComments Share: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email

Every business owner and executive needs to know the basics about commercial insurance coverage, so check out this post for details.

CommentsComments Share: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email

In a potential game changer for Michigan professional service firms, Supreme Court to review meaning of “services rendered in the city” for local income tax consideration.

CommentsComments Share: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email

Michigan Court of Appeals clarifies mortgagor’s right of property redemption, regardless of the manner of foreclosure used.

CommentsComments Share: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email

Whether contracting your kid to mow the lawn at home or executing a multi-million deal, you should probably read this blog post first for some important contract interpretation considerations.

CommentsComments Share: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email

Michigan courts have a range of options to remedy minority owner oppression claims.

CommentsComments Share: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email

Implied duties pertaining to contractual performance should not be misconstrued to allow for challenges to a contact’s fairness.

CommentsComments Share: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email

Ignorance of the terms in a personal guarantee agreement likely won’t save you from paying up under Michigan law.

CommentsComments Share: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email

Think your case is settled and over? Maybe not after this recent federal appeals court ruling involving the legal principle of collateral estoppel.

CommentsComments Share: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email

Breach of contract claims require plaintiffs to prove the contract existed, a breach occurred AND damage resulted, regardless who breached first.

CommentsComments Share: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email

Free Dos and Don'ts Guide

Topics

Recent Updates

Plunkett Cooney Blogs